⚖️ Conductor Metallurgy (ETP Copper 100% IACS vs 6101 Aluminum 56% Equivalent, Weight)

Copper vs Aluminum Busbar Optimization Calculator

Evaluate capital expenditure, total raw material weight (lbs), and enclosure cross-sectional sizing of Electrolytic Tough Pitch Copper (ETP 110 100% IACS) versus EC Aluminum alloy (6101-T6 56% IACS) in electrical busways and switchgear: save up to 45% on conductor material costs with aluminum while engineering joint silver-plating, and manufacturing yields.

1. Project & Operating Inputs

Target System Continuous Ampacity (Amps e.g. 3,000A Busbar System)

Total Conductor Run Length (Feet e.g. 300 Foot Plant Bus Distribution)

Baseline Copper Busbar System Bid Price ($ e.g. $185,000)

Turnkey Value-Engineered 6101 Aluminum Busbar System Cost ($)

2. Financial Breakdown & Yield

COPPER VS ALUMINUM BUS

Total Switchgear Conductor Material Savings

Electrical Equipment Value Engineering Margin

0.0%

Gross Revenue / Bill

Total Project CapEx

Operating / Direct Cost